The doctor recently discovered that my wife has a very rare tumor in her bladder. So, she is being referred out to another doctor for a “second opinion”.
Now, most people, I’m sure have heard of second opinions. But, have we ever stopped to think about them?
What we are saying is that while the first doctor rendered his/her “opinion”, we are looking for another “opinion”. So, we get a second “opinion”.
But, the operative word here is “opinion” not “fact”. And while opinions may be based on facts, they are still only opinions.
Using the word “opinion” gives me comfort since the medical field is admitting that they don’t know everything. But, on the other hand, it concerns me that doctors will proceed with a course of action on the basis of their “opinion” and not fact.
Here is how it works. “It is my opinion that your stomach pain is being caused by your Gall Bladder, so I suggest that it be removed.” Followed by, “Removing your Gall Bladder has not eliminated the pain, so it must be something else.”
In short, these folks are only guessing, and at your expense.